Vest Phone Radiation Protection

Sale Price:$62.00 Original Price:$70.00
sale

Wallet shielding cases by Vest are well made, offering elegant and highly effective protection.

Select Phone:
Quantity:
Add To Cart

NOTE - Please email for other sizes.

Vest anti-radiation wallet case keeps you, your phone and your identity & credit cards safe:

You – Vest wallet case minimizes your exposure to radiation emitted from the mobile device while talking or carrying the device in a pocket or close to the body.

Your phone - Vest case provides 360 degree protection to your mobile device from impacts of drops and bumps.

Your credit cards and identity - Prevents payment and identity fraud from electronic pickpockets who scan pockets or bags for contact-less credit or identity cards using "Paywave" type RFID technology. Credit Cards placed inside the vest wallet case are protected between your phone and the anti-radiation shield cover which successfully blocks RFID scanners.

How does it work?

Vest Anti-Radiation Wallet Case is integrated with a composite aluminium laminated foil and aluminium net. Situated in the front panel of the case this composite successfully minimizes the user’s exposure to radiation emitted from the mobile device.

Compare with PONG cases

Quote from Cruz Cases website: "Pong Cases have had tremendous success in the market, supported by large investors. However do Pong Cases work? Pong Cases fit to the back of the phone. There is no way signals directed out of the front of the phone going into your brain are somewhere magnetically pulled back and blocked in this fashion. Pong cases may block radiation going out of the back for the phone. If they reflect the signal, then Pong Cases reflect back the signal towards your brain doubling your exposure. On Pong Cases website, they report they cannot measure the near-field radiation protection to prove their technology. However this is false. There are near-field radiation meters used all around the world including on Cruz Case Product Video providing evidence of the shielding. We can only assume that Pong cannot provide such evidence."